![]() |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Attorney Richard M. Lewis has been appointed as a member of the Ohio State Bar Association’s Committee on the Independent Judiciary and the Unjust Criticism of Judges. The committee is charged with evaluating potential responses to the unjust criticism of judges and fostering the understanding of an independent judiciary among the public. The development of the committee results from a recognition that there are situations where a judge receives unjust criticism but is prohibited by professional ethics from responding. The Ohio State Bar Association can serve the public by providing correct information about the judges role and limitations to provide a better understanding of the legal process by members of the public. The Ohio State Bar Association will work closely with the Ohio Judicial Conference, which has a similar committee, to provide public information about the role of judges and various aspects of the legal process. The two committees will also work together when a complaint is filed to develop appropriate responses. The purpose is not to stop criticism of judges or the legal process but it is to curb unjust criticism and help to maintain the independence of the judicial branch to insure fairness in the legal system. Ohioans with concerns about the unjust criticism of judges in Ohio can forward their complaints in writing to the General Counsel of the Ohio State Bar Association, P. O. Box 16562, Columbus, Ohio, 43216-6562. The General Counsel will also forward a copy of the complaint to the committee for consideration and response. Members of the OSBA committee include: Judge John Adams, Akron; Thomas Berridge, Columbus; Beverly Briggs, Cleveland; Judge James Brogan, Dayton; Judge Mary Cacioppo, Cuyahoga Falls; James Caruso, Toledo; Judge Dale Crawford, Columbus; C. Lynne Day, Chardon; Frank Diedrichs, Cincinnati; Gerald Draper, Columbus; Judge Mike Fain, Dayton; Judge Donald Ford, Warren; Cherie Gall, Athens; C. Michael Gegenheimer, Granville; Judge Scott Gwin, Canton; Judge Charles Hague, Jefferson; Judge William Harsha, Chillicothe; Steven Herron, Columbus; Barbara Howard, Cincinnati; Thomas Intili, Dayton; Reginald Jackson, Jr., Toledo; Judge Diane Karpinski, Chair, Cleveland; William Keck, Hamilton; Richard Kerger, Toledo; Richard Lewis, Jackson; James McCrystal, Cleveland; James McMonagle, Cleveland; Christopher McNeil, Worthington; John Norwine, Cincinnati; Michael Piacentino, Marion; Judge Richard Reinbold, Canton; Judge Robert Ringland, Batavia; James Roberts, Youngstown; Judge Reginald Rouston, Findlay; Judge Ted Schneiderman, Akron; Heather Sowald, Board Liaison, Columbus; Terrance Steel, Cleveland; Geoffrey Stern, Columbus; David Tyron, Cleveland; Judge Cheryl Waite, Youngstown; Andrea Weinstein, Toledo; Judge William Young, Middletown. Mr. Lewis lectured on the topic, "Set-Offs In Cases Involving Multiple Defendants, An Analysis of Fidelholtz," at the Ohio Academy of Trial Negligence Law Seminar presented at the Holiday Inn, West, Roberts Road, Columbus, Ohio, on February 8, 2002. Attorney Lewis is a regular lecturer at continuing legal education seminars. He presented papers at several different seminar last year on topics ranging from nursing home negligence and abuse to the use of biomechanical engineers in personal injury cases. Last year Mr. Lewis also taught direct-examination techniques at a multi-day trial advocacy course presented at the Capital Law School in Columbus, Ohio. In January 2001, Mr. Lewis reorganized his law practice under the name of The Law Firm of Richard M. Lewis. Mr. Lewis has an "A" rating from Martindale-Hubbell, which is the highest rating assigned. Mr. Lewis is also a certified civil trial specialist, having received his board certification from the National Board of Trial Advocacy. Mr. Lewis concentrates his practice in the area of civil litigation, including domestic relations, insurance law, personal injury, wrongful death, employment law and commercial litigation. | ||
|
DID YOU KNOW? ● As of August 2003, only 6 out of 33 Ohio State Senators and 18 out of 99 Ohio Members of the Ohio House of Representatives in the Ohio General Assembly are lawyers. ● A study by the National Center for State Courts based on statistics from 14 states reflects no increase in the number of lawsuits filed from 1996 to 2000. ● There is no evidence that capping damages in injury cases reduces insurance rates. ● A 1999 study concluded that "states with little or no tort law restrictions have experienced the same level of [insurance rate increases] as those states that enacted severe restrictions on victims' rights." J. Robert Hunter & Joanne Dorshaw, Premium Deceit: The Failure of "Tort Reform" to Cut Insurance Prices 2 (2002). ● Time Magazine's June 2, 2003, cover story is about "medical malpractice crisis and reports that a study to be published in Weiss Ratings, an independent insurance rating agency in Florida, found that between 1991 and 2002, states with caps on non-economic damage awards saw median doctors' malpractice insurance premiums rise 48% - a greater increase than in states without caps. In states without caps, median premiums increased only 36%. Moreover, according to Weiss, "median 2002 premiums were about the same" whether or not a state capped damage awards. Time reported, "Weiss found nine states with flat or declining premiums; tow of them had caps, seven did not. Weiss speculates that state regulation of premium increases made the difference. Moreover, said Time, "caps on non-economic damages may not hold down doctors' insurance costs, but they have boosted insurers' profits... 'The caps are great for insurers,'" Weiss said. ● Caps on pain and suffering awards - so called non-economic damages - hurt most those who have suffered catastrophic injuries and experienced permanent and severe pain, disfigurement, or physical impairment, especially, children and the elderly, for whom lost wages and medical expenses do not fully reflect their loss. ● Tort filings have decreased 9% since 1992 according to the report "Examining the Work of State Courts, 2002" by the conference of State Court Administrators, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, and the National Center for State Courts Statistics Projects. ● The report "Compensation for Accidental Injuries in the United States" by the Rand Institute for Civil Justice (1991) found that one in six Americans every year suffers economic loss because of an injury but "the injured person does not even consider the notion of seeking compensation from some other person or entity." Only 2% file a law suit. ● The Volunteer Protection Act of 1997 bars suits against volunteers for non-profit organizations or government programs, even if they are negligent. ● A survey of the Federal Judiciary by the Dallas Morning news and Southern Methodist University Law School found that 96% of judges said they agree with jury verdicts most or all of the time. Nine of ten judges responding said jurors show considerable understanding of legal issues involved in the cases they hear ("judges rule in favor of juries: surveys by Morning News, SMU Law School find overwhelming support for citizens' role in court system,") (Dallas Morning News May 7, 2000). ● The general accounting office performed an analysis entitled "Analysis of Medical Malpractice: Implications of rising premiums on access to health care, general accounting office, GAO-03-836, August 2003." ● The Americans For Insurance Reform's Study, Stable Loses/Unstable Rates, shows that since 1975, Medical Malpractice paid claims per doctor in this country have tracked medical inflation very closely (slightly higher than inflation from 1975 to 1985 and flat since). ● The firm Covington and Burley represents the cigarette manufacturers, asbestos defendants, and chemical companies and created and funded the tort reform efforts of the 1990's, in the form of the Citizens Against Law Suit Abuse Organizations in most states. ● U.S. Supreme Court Justice, John Marshall, wrote in his opinion in Marbury v. Madison, 1803, "The very essence of civil liberty consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws when ever he receives an injury." ● Legislation to cap damages in medical malpractice lawsuits would "do little to hold down health care spending" or eliminate the practice of "defensive medicine," according to a Congressional Budget Office report released last week, CongressDaily reports (CongressDaily, 1/13). The report found that malpractice insurance premiums have increased in recent years in part because insurers have experienced increased in claims costs, as the amounts of damage awards in malpractice lawsuits have increased. However, the report found that malpractice insurance premiums also have increased because of reduced income from insurer investments and short-term factors in the insurance market. The report found that although malpractice insurance premiums are lower in states with caps on damages in malpractice lawsuits, "even large savings in premiums" would have a small impact on total health care spending because malpractice insurance costs account for less than 2% of spending (CBO report, 1/8). In addition, the report found that a cap on damages in malpractice lawsuits would not likely end the practice of "defensive medicine" -- in which physicians order more procedures and tests than are medically necessary to avoid malpractice lawsuits -- because "physicians who practice defensive medicine may do so less because they fear liability than to generate more income," Congress Daily reports (CongressDaily, 1/13). The report did not reach a conclusion on whether caps on damages in malpractice lawsuits affect access to health care. According to the report, although the General Accounting Office confirmed cases in which access to emergency surgery and newborn delivery was reduced in "scattered, often rural areas where providers identified other long-standing factors that affect the availability of services," The GAO also found that many reported shortages of health care services "could not be substantiated" or "did not widely affect access to health care" (CBO report, 1/8). Medical Errors. The CBO report also found no evidence that the current medical liability system prevents medical errors, a claim that some opponents of caps on damages in malpractice lawsuits have made (CongressDaily, 1/13). The report said that the medical liability system may not prevent medical errors because health care providers are "generally not exposed to the financial cost of their own malpractice" and because "very few medical injuries ever become the subject of a tort claim." (CBO report, 1/8). |
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Copyright © 2010 by The Law Firm of Richard M. Lewis. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement. |